Source Link
From the article:
Many Americans express great concern about income inequality in the
United States, but seem relatively unconcerned about global income
inequality. For example, nearly half of the world’s richest 1% of people live in the U.S., and the threshold required to make it into that elite group is only $34,000 per person, according to World Bank economist Branko Milanovic.
Is it inconsistent for an American making $34,000 to complain about the
incomes and wealth of the top 1% in the United States and yet show no
concern for the fact that he himself is in the top 1% of the world’s
population based on income? Many Americans making $34,000 and above
support income redistribution schemes (e.g. raising taxes on the top 1%)
to reduce income inequality in America. Because they are themselves in
the top 1% of the world’s population by income, shouldn’t these
Americans also support redistribution of income and wealth from
themselves (the world’s top 1%) to dirt-poor countries like Zimbabwe? If
not, why not?
Source: Mark Perry, "Some Questions for Proponents of Income Redistribution," Carp Diem/AEI Ideas, January 12, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment