From the article:
That's an excellent point, but it falls short of capturing the
perversity of the Sebelius decree. To understand (the perversity of the
Sebelius decree), begin with the observation that the distinction between being
and not being able to "afford a plan" is a fuzzy one. Some lack insurance
because they are so poor that they could not possibly pay the premiums, but it
makes more sense to consider the decision to carry insurance or not as the
product of each person's subjective evaluation of costs, benefits and risks. A
person who forgoes insurance does so because, in his circumstances, he does not
think it worth the money.
That analysis excludes those who, in the pre-ObamaCare regime,
would have purchased insurance but couldn't because pre-existing conditions
made them uninsurable. But for those who are insurable but choose to go without
insurance, the injury of ObamaCare consists entirely in the new tax the law
imposes upon them beginning this year.
Those who had policies canceled, however, were injured in a
different way by ObamaCare. For them, insurance, at least as it existed before
ObamaCare, was worth the cost. They fell victim to Obama's fraudulent claim
that "if you like your plan, you can keep it." If they are now unable
to find a plan worth buying, their primary injury consists in being deprived of
insurance. The new exemption spares them only of the lesser injury--one might
call it an insult--of being taxed for being a victim of ObamaCare.
and
That the Sundbys' broker, a seasoned insurance professional, was
unaware of all this more than a month after the ObamaCare exchanges opened for
business (and more than 3½ years after the law was enacted)
suggests yet another serious systemic problem with ObamaCare: The government
appears to have done a woefully inadequate job of educating even professionals
in the field, much less ordinary consumers, about the law's complicated and
often destructive provisions. And this is in California, the state ObamaCare
apologists have touted as the great success story.
Source: James Taranto, "The
Perverse Exemption: Political Palliatives Won't Cure ObamaCare's Ills," The Wall Street Journal, January 3, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment