Article Link
From the article:
When industry and environmental groups claim
that a regulation will solve all problems, consumers beware. It’s
probably green cronyism in disguise.
Major light bulb manufacturers supported the ban from the
outset. The profit margin on old-style bulbs was pitifully low, and
consumers just weren’t buying the higher-margin efficiency bulbs.
New standards were needed, a lobbyist for the National Electrical
Manufacturing Association told
Congress in 2007, “in order to further educate consumers on the
benefits of energy-efficient products.”
So Philips Electronics and other manufacturers joined with
environmental groups to push for tighter lighting standards. As
the New York Times Magazine explained
in 2011, “Philips told its environmental allies it was well
positioned to capitalize on the transition to new technologies and
wanted to get ahead of an efficiency movement that was gaining
momentum abroad and in states like California.” After much
negotiation, a classic “bootleggers-and-Baptists”
coalition was born. Industry and environmental groups agreed to
endorse legislation to increase lighting efficiency by 25 to 30
percent.
Source: Shaun Reagan, "Lights Out For America’s Favorite Light Bulb," reason.com, January 7, 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment